Skip to main content
· 6/7/2006

Niemiec v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Citations

  • 449 F.3d 854
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding plain error, “especially in the civil context ... must result in a miscarriage of justice in order to compel reversal”
  • finding plain error, “especially in the civil context . . . must result in a miscarriage of justice in order to compel reversal”
  • “A party’s failure to object to jury instructions results in a waiver of that objection, absent a showing of plain error.”
  • “a party’s failure to object to jury instructions results in a waiver of that objection, absent a showing of plain error.”
  • “The determination of damages is traditionally a jury function. A jury’s assessment of damages should be disturbed ‘only for the most compelling reasons.’” (citation omitted)
  • “The jury was entitled to determine what weight, if any, to give any of the expert testimony offered by the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.