Niemerg v. Bonelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that although a petition to vacate a judgment under section 2 — 1401 of the Code may be a “new action” for some purposes, such as pleading sufficiency and service of process, it is not a new case for purposes of substitution of judge under section 2 — 1001(a)(2
• finding that although a petition to vacate a judgment under section 2-1401 of the Code may be a \new action\ for some purposes, such as pleading sufficiency and service of process, it is not a new case for purposes of substitution of judge under section 2-1001(a)(2
• finding that although a petition to vacate a judgment under section 2-1401 of the Code may be a \new action\ for some purposes, such as pleading sufficiency and service of process, it is not a new case for purposes of substitution of judge under section 2-1001(a)(2) of the Code
• finding that although a petition to vacate a judgment under section 2 — 1401 of the Code may be a “new action” for some purposes, such as pleading sufficiency and service of process, it is not a new case for purposes of substitution of judge under section 2 — 1001(a)(2) of the Code
• “although a section 2-1401 petition must be filed in the same proceeding in which the judgment sought to be vacated was entered, it is not a continuation thereof but is a new proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).