Niemela v. Imperial Manufacturing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the notion that the existence of an “easier to use” or “safer” alternative addresses whether the product was unreasonably dangerous
• finding the mere occurrence of injuries insufficient, without more, “to establish that a product is unreasonably dangerous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).