Nieman v. Nieman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• judgment holding military retirement benefits to be community property is not “void” by reason of subsequent United States Supreme Court decision to the contrary
• “[A] judgment is not void and is therefore not within the ambit of 60(b)(4) simply because it is erroneous[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).