Skip to main content
· 3/27/2003

Nielson v. Patterson

Citations

  • 65 P.3d 911
  • 204 Ariz. 530
  • 2003 Ariz. LEXIS 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a vacated judgment lacks force and effect and could not be appealed
  • holding that a vacated judgment lacks force and effect and could not be appealed
  • suggesting that courts should not construe ambiguous rules of civil procedure restrietively
  • holding rules of procedure interpreted in same manner as statutes
  • interpreting the rules of procedure in the same manner as statutes
  • grant of new trial effectively vacates original judgment and places parties in position occupied before entry of judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Berch, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.