Nielsen v. St. Paul Companies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no intent to injure and thus no insurer liability in case involving repossession of property
• policy covering “bodily injury or property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the Insured”
• policy covering ‘bodily injury or property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the Insured’
• “There are some intentional acts the nature of which is such that it must necessarily be concluded that there was an intention to injure.”
• “[T]he acts must have been committed for the purpose of inflicting the injury and harm before either a policy provision excluding intentional harm applies or the public policy against insurability attaches.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).