Skip to main content
· 9/6/2002

Niehaus v. AT & T CORP.

Citations

  • 218 F. Supp. 2d 531
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16688
  • 2002 WL 31005237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deferring to FCC because the action involved “highly technical questions” concerning the re-routing of calls and the splitting of fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rakoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.