Skip to main content
· 11/18/1982

Niebel v. Burke

Citations

  • 164 Ga. App. 448
  • 297 S.E.2d 348
  • 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • damages for violating a restraining notice are “the amount of the judgment remaining unsatisfied, but limited to the amount in the account which woujd have been available to satisfy the judgment”
  • damages for violating a restraining notice are ʺthe amount of the judgment remaining unsatisfied, but limited to the amount in the account which would have been available to satisfy the judgmentʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.