· 11/18/1982
Niebel v. Burke
Citations
- 164 Ga. App. 448
- 297 S.E.2d 348
- 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2830
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- damages for violating a restraining notice are “the amount of the judgment remaining unsatisfied, but limited to the amount in the account which woujd have been available to satisfy the judgment”
- damages for violating a restraining notice are ʺthe amount of the judgment remaining unsatisfied, but limited to the amount in the account which would have been available to satisfy the judgmentʺ
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sognier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.