Nidzon v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions, USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining the “closeness in time of the [adverse] action and the remark” in determining whether a comment was “stray’’
• “most courts addressing the issue have found a five month lapse too attenuated to support the finding of a causal connection”
• “Under the law of the Second Circuit, the denial of a salary increase is . . . sufficiently material to constitute an adverse employment action.”
• denial of vacation time is not an adverse action, where all employees were subjected to the same policy
• \denial of a pay increase\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).