Skip to main content
· 6/11/1979

Nicoletti v. Damerow Ford Co.

Citations

  • 40 Or. App. 587
  • 595 P.2d 1286
  • 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because Board rule dealing with filing of answer affected obligations imposed on parties to administrative proceeding, it did not pertain solely to Board’s internal procedures and exception was unwarranted
  • because Board rule dealing with filing of answer affected obligations imposed on parties to administrative proceeding, it did not pertain solely to Board's internal procedures and exception was unwarranted
  • exception to strict compliance could not be applied because the respondent was “fully notified of the requirements for filing of answers to the complaint and the consequences of not doing so”
  • exception to strict compliance could not be applied because the respondent was \fully notified of the requirements for filing of answers to the complaint and the consequences of not doing so\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette, Johnson, Roberts, Schwab

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.