Nicole Ward F/K/A Nicole Belden and Andy Ward v. Brett Belden and Isabel Belden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the standard was met when two actions were related to the same assets and were based upon “almost identical breaches of fiduciary duty”
• The United States Court of Federal Claims “has no general power to provide equitable relief against the Government or its officers.”
• “considerations of policy divorced from the statute’s text and purpose could not override its meaning”
• “[T]he question is whether [] two suits have sufficient factual overlap.”
• “Two suits are for or in respect to the same claim, precluding jurisdiction in the [Court of Federal Claims], if they are based on substantially the same operative facts, regardless of the relief sought in each suit.” (emphasis added)
• “Except in strictly limited circumstances, see 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).