Nicole Delgado v. James C. Stegall and Western Illinois University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under Gebser, a school must have “actual knowledge of misconduct, not just actual knowledge of the risk of misconduct”
• opining that a university could be deliberately indifferent for failing to protect its current students from the risk of a known harasser
• Title IX of Educational Amendments of 1972 does not preclude claim under § 1983 against teacher in a public school
• \[I]n Davis the Court required knowledge only of ' acts of sexual harassment ' by the [harasser]\ (emphasis added)
• “[S]exual harassment of university employees is not actionable under Title IX if the employee could obtain relief under Title VII.”
• “[S]exual harassment of university employees is not actionable under Title IX if the employee could obtain relief under Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).