Nicole Cultrona v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assessing damages of $55 per day where there was neither prejudice nor bad faith
• upholding an award of penalties against defendants for not sending documents in response to a general request for “all documents” when the defendant had other evidence as to the documents plaintiff sought
• discussing exclusion where the “Covered Person [is] deemed and presumed, under the law of the locale in which the Injury is sustained, to be under the influence of alcohol or intoxicating liquors.” (emphasis omitted)
• discussing exclusion where the “Covered Person [is] deemed and presumed, under the law of the locale in which the Injury is sustained, to be under the influence of alcohol or intoxicating liquors.” (emphasis omitted)
• “[T]he key question under the clear-notice standard is whether the plan administrator knew or should have known which documents were being requested.”
• “[A] conflict of interest, standing alone, does not require reversal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).