NICOLAOS MALLAS v. GEORGE V. MALLAS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant failed to establish material need for identity disclosure where the underlying defense was “incredible”
• finding trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for identification of the CI’s identity where the defendant failed to present credible evidence of mistaken identity
• “The Commonwealth enjoys a qualified privilege to withhold the identity of a confidential source.”
• “The Commonwealth enjoys a qualified privilege to withhold the identity of a confidential source.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).