Nicola v. Washington Times Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “temporal proximity between protected activity and adverse employment action” can 18 E.M. suggests that an earlier email shows she was engaged in protected activity. Pl.’s MSJ Mem. at 36 (“By the second call with SGF on January 17th (with Ms. Crisp
• “Job termination [is] inherently an ‘adverse employment action.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).