Skip to main content
· 3/31/1988

Nicola Products Corp. v. Showart Kitchens, Inc.

Citations

  • 682 F. Supp. 171
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2767
  • 1988 WL 31227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]bsent waiver or estoppel, the thirty day period cannot be extended by court order, stipulation of the parties, or otherwise.”
  • Plaintiff was not estopped to assert the 30-day filing period to defeat removal by virtue of its agreement to hold in “abeyance” all proceedings and to extend the defendants’ time to respond to the complaint, because reliance upon such agreements for estoppel purposes was unreasonable.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bartels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.