Skip to main content
· 6/9/2004

Nickless v. Creare, Inc. (In Re Haverhill Technology Group)

Citations

  • 310 B.R. 478
  • 52 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 365
  • 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 785
  • 43 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 53
  • 2004 WL 1302312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “a motion to abstain, whether mandatory or discretionary abstention, is itself a core matter”
  • motions for remand are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157 (a)(2)(O)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joel B. Rosenthal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.