Nicki Arron Bonner v. Mr. Lewis, Director at Adoc Cpo Crowley Cpo Vega

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state prisoner was a \qualified individual\ within the meaning of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act even though his participation in prison activities was \sometimes required\
• holding that a state prisoner was a “qualified individual” within the meaning of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act even though his participation in prison activities was “sometimes required”
• holding that respondeat superior liability applies to Rehabilitation Act claims because “[t]he application of respondeat superior ... [is] entirely consistent with the policy of that statute, which is to eliminate discrimination against the handicapped”
• allowing for the doctrine of respondeat 15 superior in Section 504 claims.
• allowing for the doctrine of respondeat superior in § 504 claims.
• \Whether the prison or its programs receive federal financial assistance is a question of fact to be resolved in the district court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).