Skip to main content
· 5/9/1936

Nickell v. Reser

Citations

  • 143 Kan. 831
  • 57 P.2d 101
  • 1936 Kan. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that parenting time decisions during the dispositional phase are “left to the sound discretion of the trial court and [are] to be decided in the best interests of the child”
  • recognizing that the respondent father had deserted the minor children where he had moved out of state, did not provide support and had not had contact with the children other than telephone contact
  • recognizing that the respondent father had deserted the minor children where he had moved out of state, did not provide support and had not had contact with the children other than telephone contact
  • finding there was clear and convincing evidence that the children would be harmed if returned to the respondent-mother when she neglected to contact police after allegations of sexual abuse
  • finding there was clear and convincing evidence that the children would be harmed if returned to the respondent-mother when she neglected to contact police after allegations of sexual abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harvey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.