· 5/9/1936
Nickell v. Reser
Citations
- 143 Kan. 831
- 57 P.2d 101
- 1936 Kan. LEXIS 75
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that parenting time decisions during the dispositional phase are “left to the sound discretion of the trial court and [are] to be decided in the best interests of the child”
- recognizing that the respondent father had deserted the minor children where he had moved out of state, did not provide support and had not had contact with the children other than telephone contact
- recognizing that the respondent father had deserted the minor children where he had moved out of state, did not provide support and had not had contact with the children other than telephone contact
- finding there was clear and convincing evidence that the children would be harmed if returned to the respondent-mother when she neglected to contact police after allegations of sexual abuse
- finding there was clear and convincing evidence that the children would be harmed if returned to the respondent-mother when she neglected to contact police after allegations of sexual abuse
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harvey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.