Nicholson v. Williams & Shelton Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the transferor court had failed to address the issue, the transferee district court erred by not resolving the jurisdictional question before proceeding to the merits
• holding that a district court erred when transferring 8 an action without first determining whether a §2241 remedy under the §2255(e) savings clause.
• noting that federal prisoner petitions that “challenge the manner, location, or conditions 8 of a sentence’s execution must be brought pursuant to § 2241 in the custodial court”
• \Federal courts are always under an independent obligation to examine their own jurisdiction.\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “[P]etitions that challenge the manner, location, or conditions of a sentence’s execution must be brought pursuant to § 2241 in the custodial court.”
• “petitions that 13 challenge the manner, location, or conditions of a sentence’s execution must be brought pursuant 14 to § 2241 in the custodial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).