Skip to main content
· 6/25/1968

Nicholson v. Han

Citations

  • 162 N.W.2d 313
  • 12 Mich. App. 35
  • 33 A.L.R. 3d 1386
  • 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the plaintiff could not maintain his action for breach of contract because the claimed damages, pain and suffering, demonstrated his reliance on a prohibited tort theory
  • concluding the plaintiff could not maintain his action for breach of contract because the claimed damages, pain and suffering, demonstrated his reliance on a prohibited tort theory
  • “The negligent breach of a contract involving misfeasance gives rise to an action for tort.”
  • “The negligent breach of a contract involving misfeasance gives rise to an action for tort.”
  • “Count 1 does not allege two substantial causes of action. It is founded on allegations of breach of contract; but the gravamen of the action sounds in tort, that is, the substance of the allegations denominate a tort.”
  • similar; claims for breach of contract and medical malpractice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lesinski, McGregor, Canham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.