Skip to main content
· 6/25/1997

Nicholson v. Clatsop County

Citations

  • 941 P.2d 566
  • 148 Or. App. 528
  • 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remand required for opportunity to comment on relevant standard not included in hearing notice
  • “ORS 197.763 has a modified ‘raise it or waive it’ requirement and * * * one of the consequences of a local government’s failure to provide sufficient notice under ORS 197.763(3)(b
  • “ORS 197.763 has a modified ‘raise it or waive it’ requirement and * * * one of the consequences of a local government’s failure to provide sufficient notice under ORS 197.763(3)(b) is that otherwise unpreserved issues may be raised by an affected party in an appeal to LUBA.”
  • \ORS 197.763 has a modified `raise it or waive it' requirement and * * * one of the consequences of a local government's failure to provide sufficient notice under ORS 197.763(3)(b) is that otherwise unpreserved issues may be raised by an affected party in an appeal to LUBA.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, De Muniz Hasel-Ton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.