Nicholson v. Alvey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Tobacco II's actual reliance requirement applies equally to the unlawful prong of the UCL when the predicate unlawfulness is misrepresentation and deception” (emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “While Gravquick makes clear one such circumstance is where the legislation contains an explicit limitation, there is no logical reason to reach a different result where that limitation is implicit . . . .”
• in a case where plaintiff alleged a business practice likely to deceive members of the public (as opposed to himself), stating that \third-party reliance is insufficient to establish [plaintiff's] standing under the fraud prong of the UCL\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).