Nichols v. Tri-State Brick and Tile Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring proof that interference was “done with the unlawful purpose of causing damage and loss, without right or justifiable cause on the part of the defendant”
• identical elements applicable to tort of interference with prospective business advantage and tort of interference with contract
• identical elements applicable to tort of interference with prospective business advantage and tort of interference with contract
• identical elements applicable to tort of interference with prospective business advantage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).