Nichols v. Toomey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that constructive notice of a document can be imputed where there exists evidence that the person has engaged in \selective refusal/acceptance\ of certified mail
• holding that plaintiff who failed to timely respond to defendant’s summary judgment motion was not entitled to leave to file a late response
• concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to file late response based upon counsel’s assertion that he “miscalendared” summary-judgment hearing
• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to file late response where party did not meet “good cause” standard
• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to file late response where party did not meet \good cause\ standard
• holding that, under such circumstances, “Craddock does not apply to a motion for new trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).