Skip to main content

Nichols v. State

Citations

  • 653 S.W.2d 768
  • 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an allegation that the defendants had “met” with other co-conspirators was sufficient to state an overt act
  • phrase “conspires to commit” in section 71.02(a) does not refer to the offense of criminal conspiracy defined in section 15.02, but instead refers to statutory definition of “conspires to commit” as set forth in section 71.01(b) of Penal Code
  • phrase “conspires to commit” in section 71.02(a) does not refer to the offense of criminal conspiracy defined in section 15.02, but instead refers to statutory definition of “conspires to commit” as set forth in section 71.01(b) of Penal Code
  • op. on reh = g

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Odom, Davis, Dally, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.