Nichols v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is not sufficient identification to show that goods were of the same brand as those that were stolen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Scamardo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-10-30· cited 330×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-27· cited 96×
• Nelson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-06· cited 50×
• Taylor v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1996-03-21· cited 34×
• Rogers v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1996-08-28· cited 33×
• Christopher v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-17· cited 30×
• Medrano v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1984-01-25· cited 21×
• York v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-17· cited 17×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-10· cited 12×
• Lopez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1984-03-21· cited 10×
• Hudson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-02-02· cited 10×
• Christopher v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1989-11-22· cited 8×
• Cantu v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1983-05-19· cited 8×
• Shead v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-02-02· cited 6×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-05-03· cited 5×
• Leonard Hamilton, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-04-13
• William R. Keen, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-02-01
• Jonathan Lee Fehr v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-08-19
• Corn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-12