Skip to main content

Nichols v. State

Citations

  • 640 S.E.2d 40
  • 281 Ga. 483
  • 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 102
  • 2007 Ga. LEXIS 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that failure to object to prosecutor’s improper reflections upon a defendant’s future dangerousness may not establish ineffective assistance of counsel
  • deciding what evidence to present or to forego is a matter of strategy and tactics and, if reasonable, does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel
  • explaining that the finding of prejudice in Martin was based upon readily available medical records and expert testimony
  • defendant failed to overcome strong presumption that inaction was a strategic decision when he never asked trial counsel to explain why he did not object to prosecutor’s opinion on defendant’s veracity
  • “At the hearing on the motion for new trial, Nichols never asked defense counsel to explain why he did not object. Thus, he failed to overcome the strong presumption that the inaction was a strategic decision.”
  • “evidence of [appellant’s] previous conviction was admissible to corroborate the prosecution’s theory, by illustrating his course of conduct and bent of mind in resorting to the use of a knife to commit an unprovoked attack on one with whom he was ostensibly socializing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.