Nichols v. Rummel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where one party puts part of conversation in evidence, other party is entitled to put in evidence balance of what was said
• “Evidence of statements favorable to the defendant . . . coming from the defendant alone . . . might be viewed with the suspicion that they were of later invention”
• why the defendant had thrown away a gun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).