Nichols v. Oppermann
Citations
- 6 Wash. 618
- 34 P. 162
- 1893 Wash. LEXIS 350
Syllabus
<p>CONTRACT FOR CONVEYANCE OF LANDS — PAROL EVIDENCE.</p> <p>Parol evidence is not admissible to show the terms and conditions upon which deeds for the exchange of lands had been left with a third person, when such deeds had not been delivered in escrow, and there was no written contract for the conveyance of the lands. (Hoyt, J., dissents.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that mutual assent is a necessary element of contract formation
- listing the elements of contract formation under Mississippi law
- mutual assent necessary element of contract formation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoyt, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.