Nichols v. D. J. Rose, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant was under arrest within the meaning of the implied consent statute when the arresting officer placed him under arrest at the hospital, not when post-arrest procedural requirements were fulfilled following his release from the hospital
• holding that the defendant was under arrest within the meaning of the implied consent statute when the arresting officer placed him under arrest at the hospital, not when post-arrest procedural requirements were fulfilled following his release from the hospital
• simply because the defendant’s statements made at the time of his arrest for drunk driving were in the accident report does not mean that the officer could not testify as to what the defendant said

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).