Skip to main content
· 10/2/1992

Nichols v. Atnip

Citations

  • 844 S.W.2d 655
  • 1992 Tenn. App. LEXIS 833

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing how a defendant -5- who assumes a special relationship with a third party may also incur a duty to control the conduct of that third party
  • finding, as a matter of law, that parents had no duty to prevent them adult son from driving while intoxicated and killing the plaintiffs’ decedents, because, inter alia, there was no indication that the parents had the means or ability to exercise control over their son’s use of his car
  • No Tenn. R.App. P. 11 application filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Todd, Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.