Nichols v. AMAX COAL COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting statement of Judge Ratliff, who dissented-from denial of rehearing, in Nichols v. Amax Coal Co., 482 N.E.2d 776, 778 (Ind. Ct. App. 1985)
• When the defendant answers with an affirmative defense, “the plaintiff may, but does not have to, file a reply in avoidance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).