Nichols v. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[m]erely asserting that one will lose his or her job and its attendant salary, without more, cannot possibly provide a sufficient basis for injunctive relief’
• stating that injunctions for a plaintiff who “believed that his termination or involuntary separation was animated by discriminatory or retaliatory animus” would “paralyze[ ] [the federal government] from taking necessary personnel action”
• “[T]he federal government would be paralyzed from taking necessary personnel action every time an employee believed that his or her termination or involuntary separation was animated by discriminatory or retaliatory animus.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).