Skip to main content
· 1/15/1910

Nichols & Johnson v. Frank

Citations

  • 59 Fla. 588

Syllabus

<p>1. In equity appeals the appellants ask for a reversal of the decree appealed from, and they should have all interested parties before the court.</p> <p>2. Where the appellate court is asked to determine the correctness of a decree on the main equities of the cause e. g. the subjection of the land to the debts of creditors, all who are interested in and benefited by such decree are entitled to be heard, and should be before the court by proper proceedings if they were parties to the cause in the court below.</p> <p>3. Where all the appellees directly and substantially interested in the main feature of a decree, on which the rights of all the appellees depend, are not before the court so that complete justice may be done in orderly procedure, the court will decline to consider the merits of the cause and dismiss the appeal.</p> <p>4. Where all the appellees were before the court, but the cause was dismissed as to one of the appellees, the main equities of the cause, on which the rights of all the appellees depend, will not be considered by the court and the cause will be dismissed.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that finding of guilt as a result of an Alford plea which resulted in a suspended imposition of sentence was not a conviction for purposes of section 491.050

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.