Nicholes v. Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• telephone call advising partner that business relationship was at an end was sufficient notice of dissolution
• buy out permissible means of winding up, under UPA, where compelled liquidation would result in economic waste
• buyout permissible means of winding up, under UPA, where compelled liquidation would result in economic waste
• telephone call advising partner that business relationship was at an end was sufficient notice of dissolution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hooper v. Yoder
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-05-26· cited 53×
• Creel v. Lilly
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-12· cited 24×
• In Re the Dissolution of Midnight Star Enterprises, L.P.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-11-08· cited 23×
• Horne v. Aune
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-11-01· cited 20×
• Maras v. Stilinovich
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-05-05· cited 18×
• McCormick v. Brevig
  Montana Supreme Court· 2004-07-13· cited 16×
• Thomas v. American Nat. Bank
  Texas Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 16×
• Doting v. Trunk
  Montana Supreme Court· 1993-07-13· cited 12×
• Disotell v. Stiltner
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2004-11-05· cited 10×
• Gelman v. Buehler
  New York Court of Appeals· 2013-03-26· cited 7×
• Bernard v. Vatheuer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-05-27· cited 5×
• Martin v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-01-08· cited 3×
• Pappas v. Arfaras
  D. Connecticut· 1998-09-30· cited 1×
• Bernard v. Vatheuer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-19· cited 1×
• Thomas v. American National Bank
  Texas Supreme Court· 1986-02-19

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zimmerman v. Harding
  Supreme Court· 1913-02-24· cited 45×
• Vangel v. Vangel
  California Court of Appeal· 1953-03-11· cited 43×
• Zeibak v. Nasser
  California Supreme Court· 1938-08-19· cited 43×
• Timmermann v. Timmermann
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-08-07· cited 38×
• Wikstrom v. DAVIS ET UX
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1957-09-11· cited 26×
• Page v. Page
  California Supreme Court· 1961-01-27· cited 25×
• Napoli v. Domnitch
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1962-12-24· cited 23×
• Mayer v. Bassett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-10-09· cited 17×
• Rinke v. Rinke
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 15×
• Carrey v. Haun
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1924-07-01· cited 13×
• Frey v. Hauke
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1961-03-17· cited 10×
• Meherin v. Meherin
  California Court of Appeal· 1949-08-24· cited 10×
• Harestad v. Weitzel
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-06-12· cited 8×
• Goergen v. Nebrich
  New York Supreme Court· 1958-05-28· cited 7×
• Drashner v. Sorenson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1954-03-09· cited 6×
• McKinnis v. Dodge
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1922-01-24· cited 6×
• Bates v. Lane
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1886-06-24· cited 6×
• Gregg v. Bernards
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-03· cited 3×