NICHOLAS DOMINIQUE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Gorka to invalidate a proposal for settlement that “did not expressly require joint acceptance,” but was “clear . . . that there was one offer in the amount of $5,002 and that the offer . . . was conditioned on joint acceptance”
• applying Gorka to invalidate a proposal for settlement that “did not expressly require joint acceptance,” but was “clear . . . that there was one offer in the amount of $5,002 and that the offer . . . was conditioned on joint acceptance”
• finding the proposal invalid under Gorka where the proposal “did not expressly require joint acceptance,” but it was “clear from the proposal in this case that there was one offer in the amount of $5,002 and that the offer . . . was conditioned on joint acceptance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).