Nicholas Daskarolis and Helen Daskarolis v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even if the district court believed that it had excluded admissible evidence, the erroneous exclusion could not be grounds for a new trial because it did not affect the substantial rights of the parties
• treating harmlessness as an alternative basis to affirm district court’s ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).