Nicholas C. Synan v. Merit Systems Protection Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Case: 23-1677 Document: 42 Page: 9 Filed: 05/21/2024 HARRIS v. DEFENSE 9 suspensions totaling 14 days or less “could not be appealed” under 5 U.S.C. § 7512
• explaining that Case: 23-1677 Document: 42 Page: 9 Filed: 05/21/2024 HARRIS v. DEFENSE 9 suspensions totaling 14 days or less “could not be appealed” under 5 U.S.C. § 7512
• rejecting reliance on § 7702 because suspension was not an appealable action and refusing to transfer discrimination claims to district court where Board lacked jurisdiction over suspension of 14 days or less: “Reliance on § 7702(a)(1
• “Petitioner cannot raise before this court an issue which could have been raised below but which was not.”
• “Petitioner cannot raise before this court an issue which could have been raised below but which was not.”
• “Petitioner cannot raise before this court an issue which could have been raised below but which was not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).