· 5/14/2012
Nicholas & Associates, Inc. v. Central Laborers' Pension Fund
Citations
- 566 U.S. 1005
- 132 S. Ct. 2380
- 54 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2922
- 182 L. Ed. 2d 1052
- 80 U.S.L.W. 3634
- 2012 WL 683896
- 2012 U.S. LEXIS 3680
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Federal law requires a very specific label … , and state law forbids the use of that label.”
- “Federal law requires a very specific label … , and state law forbids the use of that label.”
- “Once a drug—whether generic or brand-name—is approved, the manufacturer is prohibited from making any major changes to . . . the drug product . . . .”
- “[T]he FDCA requires a generic drug to have the same active ingredients, route of administration, dosage form, strength, and labeling as the brand-name drug on which it is based”
- applying preemption but declining to mention the presumption against preemption
- applying preemption but declining to mention the presumption against preemption
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.