Skip to main content
· 5/14/2012

Nicholas & Associates, Inc. v. Central Laborers' Pension Fund

Citations

  • 566 U.S. 1005
  • 132 S. Ct. 2380
  • 54 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2922
  • 182 L. Ed. 2d 1052
  • 80 U.S.L.W. 3634
  • 2012 WL 683896
  • 2012 U.S. LEXIS 3680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Federal law requires a very specific label … , and state law forbids the use of that label.”
  • “Federal law requires a very specific label … , and state law forbids the use of that label.”
  • “Once a drug—whether generic or brand-name—is approved, the manufacturer is prohibited from making any major changes to . . . the drug product . . . .”
  • “[T]he FDCA requires a generic drug to have the same active ingredients, route of administration, dosage form, strength, and labeling as the brand-name drug on which it is based”
  • applying preemption but declining to mention the presumption against preemption
  • applying preemption but declining to mention the presumption against preemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.