Niako v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• whether defendant’s plea was involuntary because defendant was confused and scared at plea hearing was a fact issue for resolution by the trial court
• contradiction between the defendant’s testimony at the plea hearing and his testimony at the motion to withdraw hearing is a matter of witness credibility for the trial court
• whether defendant’s plea was involuntary because defendant was confused and scared at plea hearing was a fact issue for resolution by the trial court
• Defendant's testimony at withdrawal hearing that he was \confused and scared\ when he entered guilty plea did not permit withdrawal
• defendant’s allegations at withdrawal hearing that he was “confused and scared” when he entered guilty plea were insufficient to overturn trial court’s denial of motion to withdraw plea, where plea transcript showed plea was voluntary, intelligent and knowing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).