Niagara Preservation, Coalition, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• transferring when “many of the decisions regarding the [challenged] Project were made in New York by . . . various state agencies”
• “A plaintiff seeking to sue federal defendants in this District must instead demonstrate substantial personalized involvement by a member of the Washington, D.C. agency in order for the court to conclude that there exist meaningful ties to the District.”
• “A plaintiff seeking to sue federal defendants in this District must instead demonstrate substantial personalized involvement by a member of the Washington, D.C. Page 3 of 8 agency in order for the court to conclude that there exist meaningful ties to the District.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).