Ngou v. Schweiker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a federal agency’s delay in publishing notice and public comment, along with the agency’s decision to change benefits in the meantime, constituted arbitrary and capricious administrative action
• “The weight of authority . . . reads section 553(d) as requiring a 30-day delay between publication of the final rule and its effective date.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).