Ngalam v. Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the absence of relevant comparator evidence, the third Carr factor cannot favor the agency
• holding that Carr factor 3 cannot favor the Government when the Board finds an absence of relevant comparator evidence
• holding that in the absence of relevant comparator evidence, the third Carr factor cannot favor the agency
• holding that in the absence of relevant comparator evidence, the third Carr factor cannot favor the agency
• holding that in the absence of relevant comparator evidence, Carr factor 3 cannot favor the Government
• finding that the Board erred in considering the treatment of similarly situated whistleblowers under the third Carr factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).