NFC ACQUISITION, LLC v. Comerica Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to the McCall footnote as dicta, noting also that “dicta is not binding precedent”
• “Nothing in the text of § 1441(b), however, makes the forum defendant rule dependent on which defendant filed for removal.”
• treating a request for declaratory judgment under Ohio law as an independent claim
• treating a requests for declaratory judgment under Ohio law as an independent claim
• claims that nondiverse defendant’s financial status is allegedly de facto bankrupt is not relevant to fraudulent joinder analysis
• “invalidation of one of the intertwining contracts could create inconsistent obligations for the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).