Nextel Partners, Inc. v. Town of Amherst, NY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding relevant that the gap was not limited to “the interior of buildings” arid that the plaintiff was trying to provide “in-vehicle coverage” on roads and highways
• finding relevant that the gap was not limited to “the interior of buildings” and that the plaintiff was trying to provide “in vehicle coverage” on roads and highways

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).