Nextel Partners Inc. v. Kingston Township

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an alleged violation of FTA does not provide a basis for a § 1983 claim
• holding that an alleged violation of FTA does not provide a basis for a § 1983 claim
• finding facial challenge to wireless facilities zoning ordi- nance brought under § 332(c)(7)(B)(i) moot because of inter- vening change in ordinance
• “For defendants, assuming for the sake of argument that damages may be recovered under the TCA itself, quick review may diminish the amount that may be recovered.”
• no § 1983 remedy available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).