Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/23/1947
Newton v. State
Citations
- 150 Tex. Crim. 500
- 202 S.W.2d 921
- 1947 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 966
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring drunkenness during the witness’ perception of the crime to support impeachment
- \We have examined the authorities relied upon by appellant and are in accord with their holding that a violation of this statute will ordinarily result in a reversal if the point is properly preserved by an exception to the court's remark.\
- “We have examined the authorities relied upon by appellant and are in accord with their holding that a violation of this statute will ordinarily result in a reversal if the point is properly preserved by an exception to the court’s remark.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graves, Hawkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lagrone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-02-05· cited 911×
- Proenza, Abraham JacobCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-11-15· cited 225×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-09-13· cited 90×
- Yarbrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-05-20· cited 52×
- Lipscomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-04-27· cited 33×
- Steese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-11-16· cited 22×
- Huckert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1953-11-18· cited 13×
- Pittman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-03-05· cited 3×
- Johnson, William v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-10-17
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.