· 6/13/1994
Newton v. Shalala
Citations
- 874 F. Supp. 296
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20016
- 1994 WL 739518
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because plaintiff has enough United States earnings to qualify for United States coverage, she cannot receive total-ized benefits under the treaty.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.