Skip to main content
· 6/13/1994

Newton v. Shalala

Citations

  • 874 F. Supp. 296
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20016
  • 1994 WL 739518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because plaintiff has enough United States earnings to qualify for United States coverage, she cannot receive total-ized benefits under the treaty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.