Newsome v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court erred in awarding attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 without making findings of fact or conclusions of law or specifying applicable statutory subsection and, thus, vacating award and remanding case
• finding service sufficient where documents left outside of door after process server verified defendant’s identity through the door, but defendant refused to open the door
• rejecting the argument that the timing of the filing of the return of service has any effect on the question of whether proper service was made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).